Review: 300
I’ve read all the reviews and heard all the criticism saying that Zack Snyder’s 300 is over-the-top, tiresome, and overly-dependent on its visuals. Sure, that’s what film critics are paid to say for movies that aren’t Oscar contenders. As for me, I’m not getting paid to write this review, which means I can say what’s really on everyone’s mind after leaving the IMAX theater screening of 300: “that movie was frickin’ awesome.”
What most people fail to realize is that 300 isn’t just any other movie, or even just any other adaptation of a comic book. Instead, Snyder’s sophomore film is based on a Frank Miller graphic novel, which means the whole experience of going to the cinema becomes more like an invitation to a visual smorgasbord than simply going to see a movie. Like Robert Rodriguez’ Sin City before it, watching 300 is more like turning the pages of a intricately drawn graphic novel than it is watching a film, and Snyder, with the guidance of Frank Miller — arguably the greatest crafter of the graphic novel in history — does not disappoint in capturing the very essence of every illustration in this film. In fact, many of the shots in the movie feel as if they were taken from the book itself, more like exquisite paintings of glorified gore than simply scenes in a fluff movie.
The story is historically inaccurate, of course, and it would be a crime if Snyder did try to reflect history instead of fiction. The dialog is unrefined, of course, but the witty banter and rousing war cries are perfect for a film based on a book that reflected conversations through narrative boxes. The gore is excessive, of course, but the remarkable visual poesy of each battle scene is almost awe-inspiring. The misogyny is unnecessary, of course, but hey…this is Frank Miller, and this is Sparta after all. It is impossible to refute that visually, there have been few films as stunning as 300 and that the effects used for battle in this film are revolutionary. It is, in essence, a visual masterpiece.
So to those critics who are quick to dismiss 300 as piece of violent and pointless cinematic excess, I ask you please to first read, understand, and appreciate the tradition of the graphic novel it is meant to emulate. I then ask you to get off your high horse and realize that sometimes, you just want to see a movie with some serious ass-kicking, and 300 is the best one we’ve had in years.
Nav
Frank Miller has made some of my favourite comics, but he’s also made so much crap that I think Alan Moore reigns supreme.
Saturday
March 10, 2007
Sameer Vasta
Well, to be honest, 300 wasn’t his best graphic novel, it was mediocre at best, but it is still a good one to adapt for the screen.
Saturday
March 10, 2007
Joe
The REAL reason this movie is great is because you don’t have to try to find a reason why someone felt it necessary to put homosexual overtones into it. They just went straight to the testosterone filled action and left it at that! No homosexuals! WHEW! Something new for a change. We’re sick of having that lifestyle pushed down our throats in EVERY movie that comes out. That’s why Alexander and Troy showed poorly.
Congrats! Maybe hollywood is BACK!
Monday
March 12, 2007
Nav
Yeah 300 definitely isn’t one of his best (because it’s not The Dark Knight Returns or Batman: Year One). I wasn’t crazy about 300, the film, though I did like it enough.
Monday
March 12, 2007
Sameer Vasta
Well, I guess that’s one way to look at it Joe, but to be honest, the real reason I thought it was great was because of the way it was crafted: nothing to do with homosexuality.
Oh, and that being said, I take issue with your claim that, “we’re sick of having that lifestyle pushed down our throats” because not only do I not have any qualms at all about any kind of lifestyle, but also because you have choice: you don’t have to watch any movies that make you feel uncomfortable. No pushing down throats involved.
Monday
March 12, 2007